feat: allows users set some grpc options

[NguyenHoangSon96]

Issue Link

Proposed Changes

_ Users can set some of the rpc calls options from io.grpcCallOptions (not all, just some).
_ I have to change NettyChannelBuilder.forTarget back to NettyChannelBuilder.forAddress because the latter works well with ip addresses (more flexible).
_ I set maxInboundMessageSize = Integer.MAX_VALUE when the maxInboundMessageSize = null just for backward compatibility reasons.

Checklist

• CHANGELOG.md updated
• Rebased/mergeable
• A test has been added if appropriate
• Tests pass
• Commit messages are conventional
• Sign CLA (if not already signed)

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR introduces support for configuring the maximum RPC inbound message size for the InfluxDB client while also updating the FlightSqlClient to use NettyChannelBuilder.forAddress for improved IP address support.

• Added unit tests to verify the behavior for different inbound message size settings
• Updated FlightSqlClient to extract URI and use appropriate NettyChannelBuilder methods
• Enhanced ClientConfig with maxInboundMessageSize property and updated related methods

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File	Description
src/test/java/com/influxdb/v3/client/config/ClientConfigTest.java	Added tests for handling maxInboundMessageSize and minor adjustments in test helpers
src/main/java/com/influxdb/v3/client/internal/FlightSqlClient.java	Modified channel creation to use forAddress and added support for configurable message size
src/main/java/com/influxdb/v3/client/config/ClientConfig.java	Introduced a new property for maxInboundMessageSize and updated builder, equals, hashCode, and toString

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.66667% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.14%. Comparing base (e507aab) to head (282d5c6).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...m/influxdb/v3/client/internal/GrpcCallOptions.java	90.24%	1 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #232      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.05%   90.14%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          18       19       +1     
  Lines        1036     1126      +90     
  Branches      164      177      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits          933     1015      +82     
- Misses         40       41       +1     
- Partials       63       70       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[NguyenHoangSon96]

Hi @karel-rehor @jansimonb
Codecov complaints about test coverage
But I don't think I can test that code 🧑‍💻
Please review when you have time

[jansimonb]

Does this PR have a linked issue? What is the reason for limiting the message size? Is it ok that the metadata/header size left unlimited?

[NguyenHoangSon96]

Does this PR have a linked issue? What is the reason for limiting the message size? Is it ok that the metadata/header size left unlimited?

This is the issue link
https://github.com/orgs/influxdata/projects/108/views/1?pane=issue&itemId=101792742

[jansimonb]

The linked issue also mentions setting the max sent message size. Don't you want to add that too?

[NguyenHoangSon96]

The linked issue also mentions setting the max sent message size. Don't you want to add that too?

I talked with Karel and it looks like we need to support all transport options not just the message size limit
I will update my PR accordingly
Thank you for having taken a look 👀

[Copilot]

Copilot reviewed 9 out of 9 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

[jansimonb]

Just minor comments. Please add test for equals/hashcode/tostring to fix the decreased coverage.

[jansimonb]

LGTM, thanks! 👍