Skip to content

ENH: Use the itkNameOfTestExecutableMacro to get the test name#63

Merged
thewtex merged 1 commit intoInsightSoftwareConsortium:masterfrom
jhlegarreta:UseITKNameOfTestExecutableMacro
Jul 30, 2019
Merged

ENH: Use the itkNameOfTestExecutableMacro to get the test name#63
thewtex merged 1 commit intoInsightSoftwareConsortium:masterfrom
jhlegarreta:UseITKNameOfTestExecutableMacro

Conversation

@jhlegarreta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Use the itkNameOfTestExecutableMacro to get the test name and prevent
the the test from crashing when argv[0] is null, as recommended in:
InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK#564

@jhlegarreta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

The CI's failing is due to the fact that the ITK commit being tested against is eb54c22633fb0751574163a204714daa1e0de2ff, which dates back to Jan 30, and corresponds to v5.0rc01.

The macro at issue was still not present at that time in the itkTestingMacros.h file (was added on 4 Mar).

@thewtex
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

thewtex commented Apr 9, 2019

Thanks @jhlegarreta !

We can bump the ITK versions the Azure Pipelines configuration after 5.0 RC 2 is released, then this will be green for merge.

Use the `itkNameOfTestExecutableMacro` to get the test name and prevent
the the test from crashing when `argv[0]` is null, as recommended in:
InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK#564
@thewtex
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

thewtex commented Jul 30, 2019

Rebasing on master...

@thewtex thewtex force-pushed the UseITKNameOfTestExecutableMacro branch from bf53694 to 6d29392 Compare July 30, 2019 03:46
@thewtex thewtex merged commit 73b0ae3 into InsightSoftwareConsortium:master Jul 30, 2019
@thewtex
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

thewtex commented Jul 30, 2019

Thanks @jhlegarreta !

@jhlegarreta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

👍 @thewtex !

@jhlegarreta jhlegarreta deleted the UseITKNameOfTestExecutableMacro branch July 30, 2019 13:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants