Feat/actions workflow#3143
Merged
Merged
Conversation
GovTool - v2.0.9
fix: change env source to meta instead of process
chore: add missing ipfs secrets to workflows
chore(#2757): add exception handle on voting power query execution
chore: add missing ipfs envs for validation service
chore: lint format
chore: adjust connection pooling
chore: set ipfs environments inside dockerfile
chore: bump @intersect.mbo/pdf-ui to v0.5.10
GovTool - v2.0.10
GovTool - v2.0.10-patch1
GovTool - v2.0.10-patch2
GovTool - v2.0.10-patch3
GovTool - v2.0.10-patch4
GovTool - v2.0.11
GovTool - v2.0.11-patch1
GovTool - v2.0.11-patch1
GovTool - v2.0.11-patch2
GovTool - v2.0.11-patch3
chore: redeploy frontend
…pillar-feature-flag-argument chore: add outcome pillars feature flag argument
chore: add outcome pillars feature flag argument
Enable VITE_IS_GOVERNANCE_OUTCOMES_PILLAR_ENABLED flag on test/qa stack @mesudip
fix(#2948): committee members calculation
GovTool - v2.0.11-patch4
GovTool - v2.0.11-patch4
chore: bump @intersect.mbo/pdf-ui@0.6.1
chore: bump @intersect.mbo/pdf-ui@0.6.1
fix: missing wallet api in new-constitution action
fix: missing wallet api in new-constitution action
fix: unhandled exception when member hash is not correct
chore: get rid of window functions in drep list query
GovTool - v2.0.11-patch5
GovTool - v2.0.11-patch5
fix: gov action votes filtering
fix: gov action votes filtering
fix: gov action votes filtering
Contributor
|
✅ All checks succeeded |
2 similar comments
Contributor
|
✅ All checks succeeded |
Contributor
|
✅ All checks succeeded |
placek
approved these changes
Mar 5, 2025
Contributor
placek
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks decent and sturdy. Great job!
MSzalowski
approved these changes
Mar 5, 2025
Contributor
MSzalowski
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've left just small not needed suggestions, wonderful job @aaboyle878 🎉
| network: preview-govtool | ||
| workdir: ./govtool/backend | ||
| name: govtool-backend | ||
| dockerfile: ./govtool/backend/Dockerfile.qovery |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we can get rid of base Dockerfiles in favor of this .qovery ones (that would need adjustments to test-stack workflows). What do you think @mesudip?
Contributor
|
✅ All checks succeeded |
2 similar comments
Contributor
|
✅ All checks succeeded |
Contributor
|
✅ All checks succeeded |
MSzalowski
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2025
#3143 deployments actions adjustments by @aaboyle878
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
List of changes
Checklist