Revert "Added Sentiment Feedback Option to Feedback Modal"#3701
Merged
Ciabas merged 1 commit intoMay 29, 2025
Merged
Conversation
This reverts commit 1a0ff7e.
Ciabas
approved these changes
May 29, 2025
Contributor
|
✅ All checks succeeded |
2 similar comments
Contributor
|
✅ All checks succeeded |
Contributor
|
✅ All checks succeeded |
Ciabas
deleted the
revert/olindost/usersnap-feedback-configuration-changes
branch
Contributor
|
@MSzalowski |
Contributor
|
@MSzalowski |
Contributor
|
@MSzalowski |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This reverts commit 1a0ff7e.
@olindost
Unfortunately, we had to revert your changes provided here.
Reason for that is that these changes broke GovTool due to wrong i18n feedback label on Footer (from string literal to object) that I didn't caught on review as well as no longer supported by configuration parameters that was caught by @Ciabas.
I'll reopen the PR, so we can address this issues together in a proper place