Skip to content

Sea Ice simulations discussion using CRTM (v2.4.x and v3.x) #243

@BenjaminTJohnson

Description

@BenjaminTJohnson

@KatherineLukens-NOAA @rgrumbine

https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atot/39/10/JTECH-D-21-0187.1.pdf

I'm aware that NCO/EMC still uses CRTM v2.4.1, but I typically handle all of my ongoing work in the CRTMv3 repository, that's why this issue is here.
I can apply any code modifications to both, so it's not an issue.

This issue can be used for discussion, questions, and updates. I will first work on a variational simulation of CRTM brightness temperatures as a function of all sea-ice specific variables. There's one really flubby thing about CRTM (prior to my joining) was that NESDIS wrote instrument-specific sea-ice models (and other emissivity models), so you have stuff like this:


NESDIS_AMSRE_SICEEM_Module.f90
NESDIS_AMSU_SICEEM_Module.f90
NESDIS_ATMS_SeaICE_LIB.f90
NESDIS_ATMS_SeaICE_Module.f90
NESDIS_MHS_SICEEM_Module.f90
NESDIS_SEAICE_PHYEM_MODULE.f90
NESDIS_SSMIS_SeaIceEM_Module.f90
NESDIS_SSMI_SIceEM_Module.f90

So there's these instrument specific sea-ice modules, which take observed TBs as an input and produce a retrieved emissivity, which is then used to simulate the TB... so in a sense, it's already a retrieval algorithm, but probably not a very good one. The input TBs are not required, however if they're not provided, it falls back to an emissivity estimate (NESDIS_SEAICE_PHYEM_MODULE.f90).

I'll keep digging and updating here.

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions