Switch usage of asyncio.wait_for to async_timeout #337
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
`asyncio.wait_for` creates another tasks which leads to some race conditions in cancelation and a performance hit cpython 3.12 will change the underlying implementation of `asyncio.wait_for` to use `asyncio.wait` but that is still a long way off for many people: python/cpython#98518
Contributor
Author
|
I don't have an androidtv device though so I can't test this. I'm fixing this as a result of investigating a sluggish Home Assistant instance from the provided profile data above. |
Owner
|
Thanks! I made the same change in adb-shell: JeffLIrion/adb_shell#222 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
asyncio.wait_forcreates another tasks which leads to some race conditions in cancelation and a performance hitcpython 3.12 will change the underlying implementation of
asyncio.wait_forto useasyncio.waitbut that is still a long way off for many people:python/cpython#98518
seen on profile courtesy of @Madelena