Upgrade JD.MSBuild.Fluent to v1.3.8 and add XML comment blocks to DefinitionFactory

[Copilot]

The current version of JD.MSBuild.Fluent (v1.3.8) supports translating C# comments to XML comments in generated MSBuild files. The fluent definition was still using v1.0.2 without comment support, causing generated files to lack documentation present in the hand-maintained versions.

Changes:

• Upgraded JD.MSBuild.Fluent package reference from v1.0.2 to v1.3.8
• Added multi-line block comments to DefinitionFactory.cs matching the existing .props and .targets file documentation:
  • Props: Enablement, Granular Feature Control, Script Execution Control, Fingerprinting Control
  • Targets: Task Assembly Path, MSBuild task registration, Docker Build Pipeline, Build/Run/Publish/Clean Integration headers, Dockerfile validation

Example:

// Before (v1.0.2 - no comment support)
props.Comment("Disabled by default. Users opt-in by setting DockerEnabled=true");
props.Property("DockerEnabled", "false", condition: "'$(DockerEnabled)'==''");

// After (v1.3.8 - multi-line comments)
props.Comment(@"
  Enablement: Disabled by default. Users opt-in by setting DockerEnabled=true.
  
  To enable Docker integration, set:
    <DockerEnabled>true</DockerEnabled>
");
props.Property("DockerEnabled", "false", condition: "'$(DockerEnabled)'==''");

This ensures regenerated MSBuild files from the fluent definition retain documentation quality equivalent to the current hand-maintained versions.

Original prompt

---

This section details on the original issue you should resolve

<issue_title>[Chore] Review Pre-JD.MSBuild.Fluent-Migration State and Comments, and Add to Codebase</issue_title>
<issue_description>The current version of JD.MSBuild.Fluent (https://github.com/jerrettdavis/JD.MSBuild.Fluent)(1.3.8) supports adding comments around your fluent code to have translated into the generated XML output. We need to review the pre-update state and ensure we add the appropriate comments in the appropriate areas to ensure our generated outputs are correct and what we expected pre-migration.</issue_description>

Comments on the Issue (you are @copilot in this section)

• Fixes [Chore] Review Pre-JD.MSBuild.Fluent-Migration State and Comments, and Add to Codebase #10

---

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

[github-actions]

Code Coverage

Summary
  Generated on: 01/20/2026 - 04:02:14
  Coverage date: 01/20/2026 - 04:02:12
  Parser: Cobertura
  Assemblies: 0
  Classes: 0
  Files: 0
  Line coverage: 
  Covered lines: 0
  Uncovered lines: 0
  Coverable lines: 0
  Total lines: 0
  Covered branches: 0
  Total branches: 0
  Method coverage: 
  Full method coverage: 
  Covered methods: 0
  Fully covered methods: 0
  Total methods: 0
No assemblies have been covered.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (844912b) to head (9d7c67b).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@    Coverage Diff     @@
##   main   #11   +/-   ##
==========================
==========================

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.