Conversation
Member
Author
|
BTW, why doesn't |
mzgubic
approved these changes
Jul 19, 2022
Member
mzgubic
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
BTW, why doesn't frule(::Tuple{NoTangent, NoTangent}, f, x) just return f(x), NoTangent() always? E.g. by adding dispatch at https://github.com/JuliaDiff/ChainRulesCore.jl/blob/main/src/rules.jl#L64
Didn't think about this very deeply but it does seem fine. In fairness frules have not been used too much in the wild I think, so may just be a few low hanging fruit lying around. Could it work for Tuple{Vararg{NoTangent}} as well?
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Correction to #643 to avoid this:
which shows up in Diffractor's tests, e.g. here:
https://github.com/JuliaDiff/Diffractor.jl/runs/7414875951?check_suite_focus=true#step:6:259
Relies on JuliaDiff/ChainRulesCore.jl#567