⚡️ Speed up function _evaluate_markers by 312%#15
Open
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoopt-attempt-2from
Open
⚡️ Speed up function _evaluate_markers by 312%#15codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoopt-attempt-2from
_evaluate_markers by 312%#15codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoopt-attempt-2from
Conversation
The optimized code achieves a **312% speedup** through three key optimizations that significantly reduce overhead in marker evaluation: ## 1. **Reordered Logic in `_eval_op` (Primary Optimization)** The original code attempted to create a `Specifier` object first (extremely expensive at ~4.6μs per call), then fell back to the operator dictionary. The optimized version **reverses this logic**: - **Fast path first**: Check `_operators` dictionary immediately (~335ns per lookup) - **Slow path only when needed**: Create `Specifier` only if the operator isn't found This is highly effective because: - 926 out of 927 calls use operators like `==`, `>=`, `in` (all in `_operators`) - Only 1 call in the profiled run required `Specifier` creation - Eliminates 15.7ms of `spec.contains()` calls (73.3% of original `_eval_op` time) ## 2. **Local Variable Caching in `_evaluate_markers`** The optimization caches `groups[-1].append` as `append_group`: - Avoids repeated `groups[-1]` lookups and method attribute access in the inner loop - The loop executes 1596 times, so even small per-iteration savings compound - Updates the cached reference when groups change (on "or" markers) ## 3. **Explicit Loop Over Groups (Final Return)** Replaces `any(all(item) for item in groups)` with an explicit loop that returns `True` immediately when finding a satisfied group: - Enables early termination (6 of 269 calls in the profile returned early) - Avoids generator overhead - More readable and allows short-circuit evaluation ## Performance Impact by Test Category - **Version comparisons** (e.g., `python_version >= "3.6"`): **~307-316% faster** - These heavily use `_operators` and benefit most from avoiding `Specifier` creation - **Simple equality checks**: **~246-276% faster** - Direct operator lookups are much faster than the original's try-except flow - **Large marker lists** (100+ markers): **~527-533% faster** - Compound effects of all optimizations plus better cache locality - **Set operations** (`in`/`not in`): **~11-31% faster** - Already fast, modest improvement from local variable caching ## Hot Path Analysis Based on `function_references`, `_evaluate_markers` is called from `Marker.evaluate()`, which is the primary public API for marker evaluation in the packaging library. This function is likely invoked: - During dependency resolution (checking if packages apply to the current environment) - When processing package metadata - In lock file validation The optimization is particularly valuable because markers are evaluated frequently during package installation and dependency resolution workflows, where even microsecond improvements compound across thousands of package evaluations.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 312% (3.12x) speedup for
_evaluate_markersinsrc/packaging/markers.py⏱️ Runtime :
2.31 milliseconds→561 microseconds(best of5runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 312% speedup through three key optimizations that significantly reduce overhead in marker evaluation:
1. Reordered Logic in
_eval_op(Primary Optimization)The original code attempted to create a
Specifierobject first (extremely expensive at ~4.6μs per call), then fell back to the operator dictionary. The optimized version reverses this logic:_operatorsdictionary immediately (~335ns per lookup)Specifieronly if the operator isn't foundThis is highly effective because:
==,>=,in(all in_operators)Specifiercreationspec.contains()calls (73.3% of original_eval_optime)2. Local Variable Caching in
_evaluate_markersThe optimization caches
groups[-1].appendasappend_group:groups[-1]lookups and method attribute access in the inner loop3. Explicit Loop Over Groups (Final Return)
Replaces
any(all(item) for item in groups)with an explicit loop that returnsTrueimmediately when finding a satisfied group:Performance Impact by Test Category
python_version >= "3.6"): ~307-316% faster - These heavily use_operatorsand benefit most from avoidingSpecifiercreationin/not in): ~11-31% faster - Already fast, modest improvement from local variable cachingHot Path Analysis
Based on
function_references,_evaluate_markersis called fromMarker.evaluate(), which is the primary public API for marker evaluation in the packaging library. This function is likely invoked:The optimization is particularly valuable because markers are evaluated frequently during package installation and dependency resolution workflows, where even microsecond improvements compound across thousands of package evaluations.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Click to see Generated Regression Tests
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-_evaluate_markers-mjjjsfhpand push.