Update README #323
Merged
Update README #323
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello! I am a user of this validator crate.
I recently had the opportunity to apply a custom validation. While reading the documentation, I noticed that the way to take arguments and add them to the validation differs from what is described in the README. It seems that the latest 0.18.0 has a different definition due to the implementation changes made by the following PR
Since this is the case, I decided to rewrite the README and create a PR.
While I made an effort to find related issues and PRs, I needed help locating them. If any are pending or planned, I would appreciate it if they could be addressed. I'm open to closing this if necessary.
I have confirmed that the code in the documentation works with
0.18.0, but I would appreciate it if you could point out any omissions.