Hi there,
Thank you for your contribution and the hard work you’ve put into creating this benchmark. It's very inspiring and valuable.
I’ve been reviewing the remove_extra function and wanted to share an observation. As I understand it, the function is intended to remove extra test inputs and natural language descriptions, preserving only the relevant test code.
Here’s the current implementation:
def remove_extra(testcase, func_name, lang='python'):
"""Remove extra test inputs and natural language descriptions before and after the test method.
Only keep the contents between def test() and solution.{func_name}"""
lines = testcase.split('\n')
func_startline = 0 # the line where test function starts (def test....)
for i in range(len(lines)):
if 'def test' in lines[i]:
func_startline = i
break
test_endline = len(lines)
for i in range(len(lines)):
if f'solution.{func_name}' in lines[i]: # first call to the function under test
test_endline = i + 1
break
new_testcase = '\n'.join(lines[func_startline:test_endline])
return new_testcase
The issue is that this implementation assumes the first call to solution.{func_name} marks the end of the test logic. However, this is often not the case as assertions and other important test logic typically follow the function call. As a result, this function may inadvertently remove valid assertion lines, leading to incomplete test cases.
One consequence of this is that the test may be marked as success with no exception thrown, even if assertions are missing, which can impact the correctness metrics reported.
Please let me know if I’ve misunderstood any part of this. I hope this can be addressed in a future update.
Best regards,
Flora Lan
Hi there,
Thank you for your contribution and the hard work you’ve put into creating this benchmark. It's very inspiring and valuable.
I’ve been reviewing the
remove_extrafunction and wanted to share an observation. As I understand it, the function is intended to remove extra test inputs and natural language descriptions, preserving only the relevant test code.Here’s the current implementation:
The issue is that this implementation assumes the first call to
solution.{func_name}marks the end of the test logic. However, this is often not the case as assertions and other important test logic typically follow the function call. As a result, this function may inadvertently remove valid assertion lines, leading to incomplete test cases.One consequence of this is that the test may be marked as
successwith no exception thrown, even if assertions are missing, which can impact the correctness metrics reported.Please let me know if I’ve misunderstood any part of this. I hope this can be addressed in a future update.
Best regards,
Flora Lan