Complete migration from srcURL and returnURL to returnUrl #850
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
labkey-adam
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2025
| editWellsURL.addParameter("editWellReturnUrl", getReturnURL().toString()); | ||
| URLHelper returnUrl = getReturnUrl(); | ||
| editWellsURL.addReturnUrl(returnUrl); | ||
| editWellsURL.addParameter("editWellReturnUrl", getReturnUrl().toString()); |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reuse returnUrl here? Doesn't really matter...
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale
In 2021 we made a major push to use
returnUrlconsistently instead ofsrcURLorreturnURL. We can finish the job.Issue 7580: inconsistent use of returnUrl parameter
Related Pull Requests
Changes
returnUrland get rid of code checking for old versions of the parameters