-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
Jorrit add custom errors for transaction class and transaction parameters #38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
SwenSchaeferjohann
merged 16 commits into
main
from
jorrit-add-custom-errors-transaction
Mar 13, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
57940df
implemented custom errors in transaction class not tested
ananas-block fcd9923
added getAssetPubkeys tests and fixed the fn
ananas-block 6eff93b
added no u64 errors
ananas-block 3c47a7d
completed deposit tests for transaction parameters
ananas-block 1d2e318
added functional TransactionParameters tests
ananas-block e27ea5c
transaction parameters tests work clean functional + errors
ananas-block 8991b12
removed transaction class errors after refactor
ananas-block c3cbb0d
removed prints
ananas-block 1c028c4
fixed verifiers for tx params refactor
ananas-block 1ccc7fb
functional tests except user class run
ananas-block e6bb4b7
user class functional tests run
ananas-block 1fc0f1d
adapted circuit tests
ananas-block 38163a6
verifier two functional test runs
ananas-block ba9aebf
verifier two tests runs
ananas-block d3dc44c
adapted remaining system programs tests
ananas-block b1b4474
fixed tests after rebase
ananas-block File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see those changes being made back and forth (from array syntax to
b""strings and back). Any idea what causes that? Typescript/node version?If you have no idea, I will try to find out. :)
It's quite annoying to have these all the time - it's quite distracting while reviewing or rebasing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@vadorovsky seems like the differences in idl layout were due to my using anchor 0.25.0.
using the latest anchor v 0.27.0 resolves the issue