Merged
Conversation
Parse prolite across auth, session, registry, and usage paths. Render the CLI label as 'pro lite'. Tested: zig build run -- list Tested: zig build test
@loongphy/codex-auth-darwin-arm64
@loongphy/codex-auth-darwin-x64
@loongphy/codex-auth-linux-arm64
@loongphy/codex-auth-linux-x64
@loongphy/codex-auth-win32-arm64
@loongphy/codex-auth-win32-x64
@loongphy/codex-auth
commit: |
Owner
|
Thanks for your contribution. I made some updates to align with Codex CLI subscription plan label. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
proliteplanFree,Plus,Pro, andPro LiteWhy
The new
proliteplan (Pro x5) is not parsed yet, socodex-authfalls back tounknowninstead of showing the actual plan in CLI output.Codex already added support for the same raw plan type and human-readable display name here:
Verification