Coveralls always errors "Source not available"

[utkbansal]

Expected behaviour

On clicking a file in the Coveralls' report, I should be able to see the lines which are no longer covered due to changes made in the PR.

Actual behaviour

Source not available
The file "/home/travis/miniconda/envs/test/lib/python2.7/site-packages/MDAnalysis/core/selection.py" isn't available on github. Either it's been removed, or the repo root directory needs to be updated.

Potential fix

The error says that coveralls tried to look for the source code files at /home/travis/miniconda/envs/test/lib/python2.7/site-packages/MDAnalysis/. I think it should look in the cloned folder instead. We need to change the repo root to make this work.

It would be huge help for me if we could fix this. Comparing multiple coverage reports manually is a pain.

EDIT

Related issue on coveralls github at lemurheavy/coveralls-public#263

[richardjgowers]

@utkbansal I think I've fixed this, can you confirm?

[utkbansal]

Yes, I can now see the files with the coverage data. Thanks!

…

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Richard Gowers ***@***.***> wrote: @utkbansal <https://github.com/utkbansal> I think I've fixed this, can you confirm? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1445 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH9W-PJ9ICxD9KzF5BivUT3Fg-RPXMYdks5sI4JigaJpZM4OJFWr> .

[orbeckst]

Coveralls does not show line-by-line coverage anymore, even though coveralls is back (#1918)

For example, going into the Source Files on develop section, clicking LIST, and selecting ...kages/MDAnalysis/analysis/encore/confdistmatrix.py gives

Source Not Available

The file "/home/travis/miniconda/envs/test/lib/python3.5/site-packages/MDAnalysis/analysis/encore/confdistmatrix.py" isn't available on github. Either it's been removed, or the repo root directory needs to be updated.

[richardjgowers]

Yeah so it's not correctly detecting where in the repo corresponds to the files it's being told about. I think maybe doing a developer installation on travis might fix this, so then the source files aren't put into a conda env

[jbarnoud]

This would be dangerous, though. Indeed, the tests would not fail if a new file is not added correctly to setup.py.

[orbeckst]

Should we switch from coveralls to coverage codecov ? We already use coverage codecov for other projects and we managed to get it to work for those (e.g. pmda).