Skip to content

Use stricter type for pkdtree indices#2025

Merged
tylerjereddy merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
int64_kdtree
Aug 5, 2018
Merged

Use stricter type for pkdtree indices#2025
tylerjereddy merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
int64_kdtree

Conversation

@jbarnoud
Copy link
Contributor

@jbarnoud jbarnoud commented Aug 5, 2018

Using consistently np.int64 for the indices used in pkdtree avoids type
errors when using unique_int_1d. This should reduce the number of
failing tests on windows.

PR Checklist

  • Tests?
  • Docs?
  • CHANGELOG updated?
  • Issue raised/referenced?

Using consistently np.int64 for the indices used in pkdtree avoids type
errors when using unique_int_1d. This should reduce the number of
failing tests on windows.
@jbarnoud
Copy link
Contributor Author

jbarnoud commented Aug 5, 2018

AppVeyor failures go down back to 13.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 5, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #2025 into develop will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2025   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    88.45%   88.45%           
========================================
  Files          143      143           
  Lines        17223    17223           
  Branches      2637     2637           
========================================
  Hits         15234    15234           
  Misses        1389     1389           
  Partials       600      600
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
package/MDAnalysis/lib/pkdtree.py 94.36% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c00a04a...2031156. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@tylerjereddy tylerjereddy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM -- back to original Windows test suite failure count.

@tylerjereddy tylerjereddy merged commit 2c9d6c5 into develop Aug 5, 2018
@tylerjereddy tylerjereddy deleted the int64_kdtree branch August 5, 2018 16:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants