Skip to content

Conversation

@qmfrederik
Copy link
Contributor

The debugger protocol defines optional arguments (like the executionContextId argument on the runScript method.

When this property is present in the JSON, even with the default value of 0, the Chrome debugger will try to interpret this value. This caused some issues for me - I don't know which value to provide for the executionContextId and Chrome wasn't happy with the default value of 0, but if I removed the executionContextId property from the generated JSON, all was well.

This PR changes the code generation of optional properties of type long and bool to use nullable types long? and bool?, and adds a [JsonProperty(NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore)] attribute to all operational properties, ensuring they are absent from the generated JSON unless explicitely set.

This PR builds on #10 (which now has passing unit tests) so you'd probably want to review that PR first, and then evaluate this one.

If you have questions/feedback, let me know!

…attribute to ensure the mapping is done properly
- Set NullValueHandling to NullValueHandling.Ignore, so that null values are not serialized
- If .NET primitive types (like bool or long) are optional, use nulltable types, so that they can be ignored when serializing
@brewdente
Copy link
Member

Wow, this one seemed to have gotten lost. Is it still worth merging this one? I think so, but I'm afraid it might break the other pull requests here? Any thoughts?

@qmfrederik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Well, in the end it's mainly the code-generating logic that has changed. This is a pretty important one for us, so it would be good if you can accept this.

I'd suggest to do this before #15, and have #15 re-generate the C# code based on these changes. That way, ChromeDevTools is fully up to date once more :)

I'll try to take some time later today to fix issues with the .NET Core tooling - VS2017 has been released so that needs some updating.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants