Skip to content

Feature/393#135

Merged
ddelpiano merged 61 commits intodevelopmentfrom
feature/393
Jan 3, 2020
Merged

Feature/393#135
ddelpiano merged 61 commits intodevelopmentfrom
feature/393

Conversation

@ddelpiano
Copy link
Member

  • Dockerfile-postgres modified to inject data by default in the database
  • Dockerfile-virgo modified to reduce the footprint by the data and take into account the branch we should build (we need to modify this slightly when we will align scidash with the latest version of geppetto, this means changing all the branches used by the copy.sh script, at the moment I am using alpha and simflag tags).
  • Dockerfile-scidash modified to split virgo by the python backend (thx @zsinnema), install backend and frontend makefile and scripts now modified to build the branch passed by the travis build.
  • .travis.yml added
  • trigger-travis.sh added and configured to trigger python unit tests (for now it's a simple echo that needs to be replaced in the travis file when these will be ready) ad then trigger the other build on geppetto-scidash providing the branch from here.
  • other improvements brought from @zsinnema branch with feature/400.

ddelpiano and others added 30 commits August 24, 2019 00:18
…import path filter per empty string and null removed from compatibility, other minors
fixed various issues with filters, import path default empty string, …
deployment scripts to check services and other stuff
geppetto-scidash version bumped up with new fixes
@ddelpiano
Copy link
Member Author

@jrmartin @ddelpiano the issue is that feature/399 from geppetto-scidash uses the development branch of scidash but the feature/393 (split the docker images) isn't in the development branch yet. During the work to split the docker images I also encountered the problem (the build can't download openjdk 8 anymore). I fixed it in the feature/400 which is merged into feature/393.
So to fix this we should merge feature/393 into development.

@zsinnema @jrmartin I fixed this within the branch itself, it should work now (just run the last build to double check).

@ddelpiano ddelpiano merged commit 5edde4b into development Jan 3, 2020
@ddelpiano ddelpiano deleted the feature/393 branch April 21, 2021 17:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants