Skip to content

Conversation

@ccharly
Copy link
Contributor

@ccharly ccharly commented Dec 5, 2024

Explanation

Just spotted this small typo while reviewing some PRs.

References

N/A

Changelog

N/A

Checklist

  • I've updated the test suite for new or updated code as appropriate
  • I've updated documentation (JSDoc, Markdown, etc.) for new or updated code as appropriate
  • I've highlighted breaking changes using the "BREAKING" category above as appropriate
  • I've prepared draft pull requests for clients and consumer packages to resolve any breaking changes

@ccharly ccharly requested a review from a team as a code owner December 5, 2024 16:41
Copy link
Member

@Gudahtt Gudahtt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@ccharly ccharly enabled auto-merge (squash) December 5, 2024 16:43
@ccharly ccharly disabled auto-merge December 5, 2024 16:44
@ccharly ccharly enabled auto-merge (squash) December 5, 2024 16:44
@ccharly ccharly merged commit c2d3c1d into main Dec 5, 2024
122 checks passed
@ccharly ccharly deleted the fix/assets-CODEOWNERS branch December 5, 2024 16:46
ccharly added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2024
…s) (#5061)

## Explanation

Found the same typo than last time, but on another section of the
CODEOWNERS.

Spotted while doing this release:
- #5058

## References

Similar to:
- #5029

## Changelog

N/A

## Checklist

- [x] I've updated the test suite for new or updated code as appropriate
- [x] I've updated documentation (JSDoc, Markdown, etc.) for new or
updated code as appropriate
- [x] I've highlighted breaking changes using the "BREAKING" category
above as appropriate
- [x] I've prepared draft pull requests for clients and consumer
packages to resolve any breaking changes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants