Skip to content

Conversation

@mcmire
Copy link
Contributor

@mcmire mcmire commented Sep 17, 2025

This release publishes a new minor version of @metamask/transaction-controller, which primarily adds new messenger events that SmartTransactionsController can now use instead of receiving function references.


This release includes:

  • @metamask/transaction-controller (60.3.0 -> 60.4.0)

@mcmire mcmire marked this pull request as ready for review September 17, 2025 14:48
@mcmire mcmire requested review from a team as code owners September 17, 2025 14:48
Copy link
Member

@Gudahtt Gudahtt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@mcmire mcmire enabled auto-merge (squash) September 17, 2025 15:30
@mcmire mcmire merged commit 7d08c95 into main Sep 17, 2025
239 checks passed
@mcmire mcmire deleted the release/561.0.0 branch September 17, 2025 15:36
@ffmcgee725 ffmcgee725 mentioned this pull request Sep 19, 2025
4 tasks
ffmcgee725 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2025
## Explanation

Release for `@metamask/eip-5792-middleware`
- Add `auxiliaryFunds` + `requiredAssets` support defined under
[ERC-7682](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7682)
([#6623](#6623))
- Bump `@metamask/transaction-controller` from `^60.2.0` to `^60.4.0`
([#6561](#6561),
[#6641](#6641))
- Bump `@metamask/utils` from `^11.4.2` to `^11.8.0`
([#6588](#6588))

<!--
Thanks for your contribution! Take a moment to answer these questions so
that reviewers have the information they need to properly understand
your changes:

* What is the current state of things and why does it need to change?
* What is the solution your changes offer and how does it work?
* Are there any changes whose purpose might not obvious to those
unfamiliar with the domain?
* If your primary goal was to update one package but you found you had
to update another one along the way, why did you do so?
* If you had to upgrade a dependency, why did you do so?
-->

## References

<!--
Are there any issues that this pull request is tied to?
Are there other links that reviewers should consult to understand these
changes better?
Are there client or consumer pull requests to adopt any breaking
changes?

For example:

* Fixes #12345
* Related to #67890
-->

* Fixes https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/browse/WAPI-409

## Checklist

- [ ] I've updated the test suite for new or updated code as appropriate
- [ ] I've updated documentation (JSDoc, Markdown, etc.) for new or
updated code as appropriate
- [ ] I've communicated my changes to consumers by [updating changelogs
for packages I've
changed](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/tree/main/docs/contributing.md#updating-changelogs),
highlighting breaking changes as necessary
- [ ] I've prepared draft pull requests for clients and consumer
packages to resolve any breaking changes
aganglada pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2025
## Explanation

Release for `@metamask/eip-5792-middleware`
- Add `auxiliaryFunds` + `requiredAssets` support defined under
[ERC-7682](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7682)
([#6623](#6623))
- Bump `@metamask/transaction-controller` from `^60.2.0` to `^60.4.0`
([#6561](#6561),
[#6641](#6641))
- Bump `@metamask/utils` from `^11.4.2` to `^11.8.0`
([#6588](#6588))

<!--
Thanks for your contribution! Take a moment to answer these questions so
that reviewers have the information they need to properly understand
your changes:

* What is the current state of things and why does it need to change?
* What is the solution your changes offer and how does it work?
* Are there any changes whose purpose might not obvious to those
unfamiliar with the domain?
* If your primary goal was to update one package but you found you had
to update another one along the way, why did you do so?
* If you had to upgrade a dependency, why did you do so?
-->

## References

<!--
Are there any issues that this pull request is tied to?
Are there other links that reviewers should consult to understand these
changes better?
Are there client or consumer pull requests to adopt any breaking
changes?

For example:

* Fixes #12345
* Related to #67890
-->

* Fixes https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/browse/WAPI-409

## Checklist

- [ ] I've updated the test suite for new or updated code as appropriate
- [ ] I've updated documentation (JSDoc, Markdown, etc.) for new or
updated code as appropriate
- [ ] I've communicated my changes to consumers by [updating changelogs
for packages I've
changed](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/tree/main/docs/contributing.md#updating-changelogs),
highlighting breaking changes as necessary
- [ ] I've prepared draft pull requests for clients and consumer
packages to resolve any breaking changes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants