forked from theelims/ESP32-sveltekit
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
d0 tuning #63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
d0 tuning #63
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify stack sufficiency and update misleading comment.
The effectTask stack size for non-PSRAM boards has been reduced from 4KB to 3KB (25% reduction). The inline comment states "updated from 4 to 6 to support preset loop," which appears to contradict the actual change.
Concerns:
Please verify that 3KB is sufficient for effectTask on non-PSRAM ESP32-D0 boards, and update the comment to accurately reflect the stack size changes.
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 2731
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 1610
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 2173
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 0
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 753
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 0
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 1185
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 146
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 7897
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 59
Fix misleading comment and verify 3KB stack is sufficient.
The effectTask stack size was reduced from 4KB to 3KB for non-PSRAM boards (25% reduction). The inline comment stating "updated from 4 to 6" is incorrect—the actual change is 4→3 for non-PSRAM (PSRAM remains 6KB unchanged).
Concerns:
Update the comment to accurately reflect: "reduced from 4 to 3 for non-PSRAM to..." and verify the stack is adequate or document the tradeoffs made.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents