-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
Fix order creation time display bug #386
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Catrya
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
fix-created-at
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Temporary workaround: hardcoded expiration hours may not match actual Mostrod configuration.
The hardcoded value of 24 hours decouples the displayed message from the actual
expiration_hourssetting in Mostrod. If the instance uses a different value (e.g., 40 hours as mentioned in issue #358), the message will be inconsistent with the actual order expiration.While this is preferable to the previous bug (showing future-relative times), please ensure the TODO is tracked. Do you want me to help verify when
mostroInstance.expirationHourswill be available, or open an issue to track this technical debt?Note: Other actions in this file successfully use
mostroInstance?.expirationSeconds(lines 67-71, 80-84, etc.), suggesting the issue is specifically with the availability of anexpirationHoursfield rather than access tomostroInstanceitself.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The hardcoded 24 hours maintains the existing behavior - before this PR, the buggy code was already always displaying 24 hours regardless of the actual mostroInstance configuration due to parsing
expirationas a relative time string instead of using the proper expirationSeconds field.This PR only fixes the critical "in X days" timestamp bug. The proper mostroInstance.expirationSeconds integration will be handled in a separate PR to avoid mixing concerns.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Catrya, thank you for the clarification! That makes sense—if the previous code was already displaying 24 hours regardless of configuration, then maintaining that behavior while fixing the critical timestamp bug is a reasonable approach. Separating the timestamp fix from the expiration hours integration keeps the PRs focused and easier to review.
The TODO comment in the code will serve as a reminder for the follow-up work. If you'd like, I can help track this by opening a GitHub issue to capture the technical debt (integrating
mostroInstance.expirationSecondsfor thenewOrderaction), but that's entirely optional.Thanks for the context on the existing behavior! 👍
🧠 Learnings used