You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
we can implement the inconsiste $a a_s$ solution, neglecting the commutators in the first picture, if this corresponds to neglect $a a_s \cdot f_2$ terms in the second picture
this has to be proven
and then it has to be checked numerically not to be too drastic (coupling-wise is a correction of order NNLO QCD, since $a a_s \sim a_s^3$
$\varepsilon$-trick
we can implement the $\varepsilon$ trick, but we won't
this can be implemented in the following replacing the a_half with a_half * epsilon after pure QED and LO QCD (using contracted gammas), and running with:
$\varepsilon = 0$ for LO exact
$\varepsilon = 1$ for $N^kLO$ exact
$\varepsilon = \pm 10^{-5}$ to implement the $\varepsilon$-trick (and then recombine before the Mellin inversion)
4x4 singlet exact
Inconsistent$a a_s \cdot f_2$ solution
the expression in the previous picture is easily proven to be equivalent to Eq. (11) of https://github.com/scarrazza/apfel/blob/master/doc/pdfs/TruncatedSolution.pdf
a_halfwitha_half * epsilonafter pure QED and LO QCD (using contracted gammas), and running with:eko/src/eko/kernels/singlet.py
Lines 331 to 351 in 13197aa