N3LO singlet ad#137
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #137 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 78 78
Lines 3677 3721 +44
=========================================
+ Hits 3677 3721 +44
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
alecandido
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For me it is good enough, but maybe I'd wait for @felixhekhorn this time. It is hard to tell that your numbers make sense, but tests are sensible and passing, so far so good.
I just pointed out a few style remarks (mainly on docstrings).
Co-authored-by: Alessandro Candido <candido.ale@gmail.com>
felixhekhorn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- please make Li a rm name in TeX (either global or local)
- the parenthesis in the exponent here https://github.com/N3PDF/eko/blob/206cd3f38662f621b519cdcf7d7833c787f7f764/doc/source/theory/N3LO_ad.rst#L142 is definitely confusing
- https://github.com/N3PDF/eko/blob/206cd3f38662f621b519cdcf7d7833c787f7f764/doc/source/theory/N3LO_ad.rst#L8 an "analytical expression" I guess?
- https://github.com/N3PDF/eko/blob/206cd3f38662f621b519cdcf7d7833c787f7f764/doc/source/theory/N3LO_ad.rst#L21 ->
|NNLL| - https://github.com/N3PDF/eko/blob/206cd3f38662f621b519cdcf7d7833c787f7f764/doc/source/theory/N3LO_ad.rst#L5 ->
|DIS|(in case there is such an abbreviation - else you can inline here)
it may seem a lot of comments, but they are really mostly minor stuff about docs - but we just promised the other day we would put an effort ;-)
Co-authored-by: Felix Hekhorn <felixhekhorn@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Felix Hekhorn <felixhekhorn@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Felix Hekhorn <felixhekhorn@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Felix Hekhorn <felixhekhorn@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Felix Hekhorn <felixhekhorn@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@giacomomagni just to repeat: #105 is actually built on top of this so we need to close this one first - which I believe we can |
Complete implementation of N3LO splitting functions