Reorganize package content#194
Conversation
|
This will also simplify #185, eventually. |
|
@felixhekhorn do you actually want a review now, or are you just attracting our attention on the topic? |
|
no, not yet - I want to attempt the move into |
|
Maybe we should make a poll about how to sort external dimensions, currently:
I'm positive about keeping 4 and 5 in their current position, encoding them in modules and functions respectively. But I'm quite unopinionated on the first three. |
giacomomagni
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Test are passing, so these changes should be enough :)
For review: please @alecandido @niclaurenti @giacomomagni have a look now
|
The base branch was changed.
4c72a96 to
07aa331
Compare
The idea is to split the hard math away from the other administrative stuff (such as how to join operators etc.). This would be a small step towards #185 and eventually #189.