Backward Evolution Study

[giacomomagni]

This PR is for the backward evolution study. We seek for the charm pdf below its mass threshold.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #74 (707b3da) into develop (08df898) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 707b3da differs from pull request most recent head 4977739. Consider uploading reports for the commit 4977739 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop       #74    +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%            
==========================================
  Files           29        44    +15     
  Lines         2143      2580   +437     
==========================================
+ Hits          2143      2580   +437     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/eko/evolution_operator/__init__.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/eko/matching_conditions/__init__.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/eko/matching_conditions/n3lo/f_functions.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/eko/matching_conditions/nnlo.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/eko/anomalous_dimensions/harmonics.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/eko/evolution_operator/grid.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/eko/matching_conditions/n3lo/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/eko/matching_conditions/n3lo/aHg.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/eko/matching_conditions/n3lo/aHgstfac.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/eko/matching_conditions/n3lo/aHq.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 12 more

[felixhekhorn]

• actually: this is quite a general feature - we maybe want to lift this into banana, (by improving get_pdf, e,g,?)
• this may also affect our run calls - the pdf argument could e.g. become a tuple (set_name, member) and if it is just a string then cast it to member=0 (as is currently)

[felixhekhorn]

• if you want all replicas, we could provide a helper function, that spells out the respective tuples

[felixhekhorn]

Workflows were failing due to 3f2271a

[giacomomagni]

The N3LO matching is fully numbified and can be evaluated within 10 minutes.

[felixhekhorn]

The N3LO matching is fully numbified and can be evaluated within 10 minutes.

Perfect 👍 ! did you by chance already take a look with cProfile on what the bottleneck is? (There is some preliminary stuff in yadism )

[giacomomagni]

Not yet, good suggestion, I'll look into this!

[alecandido]

The moment we merge #83 and #85, I'd propose we'll close this branch: the snapshot has already been taken, and the two PRs should take from here everything we want to keep.

(of course, if there will be still leftovers, we'll open another PR and wait also for that one)

EDIT: e.g. we might want to import some plots or plotting features in #79

[alecandido]

Since we actually merged #83 do we want to close this PR? @giacomomagni @felixhekhorn

[felixhekhorn]

I'd suggest to wait for the acceptance of the paper

[giacomomagni]

I'd say let's close this :)