Implementation of CMS_Z0J_13TeV - general cleanup#2468
Conversation
enocera
changed the title
|
I was about to ask you about #2360 you read my mind! |
| rule: "pT <= 170" | ||
|
|
||
| - dataset: CMS_Z0J_13TEV_PT-M | ||
| reason: Remove first invariant mass bin which is completely off. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No I don't. And I don't see any reason why the NNLOjet runcard should be wrong. At this point life is too short, and I would just impose a cut, as I did. If you want I can add "which is completely off for unknown reasons".
| description: "Z boson mass squared" | ||
| label: '$m^2_{\ell \ell}$' | ||
| units: "GeV^2" | ||
| file: kinematics.yaml |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think the m_ll variable is actually squared.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You're totally right. Fixed. I am regenerating the data-theory comparison plots.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Here are the plots with the correct label.
scarlehoff
left a comment
scarlehoff
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please check hte m_ll comment. Looking at kinematics.yaml they look like GeVs
You're right. These are GeV. Just look at the Z-mass peak in the data-theory comparison plots. The square does not make sense at all. Apologies. |
|
fwiw, I would actually prefer to keep m_ll and use that in process options (so it needs to be changed to accept it) It's easier to understand the numbers/plots/cuts that way (but no strong opinion). |
OK, so let me do that. |
|
@scarlehoff If you're happy with the changes, I'll proceed to merge this PR, and then rebase #2469 . |
2 participants
This PR replaces and supersedes part of #2360 . This PR contains the cleaned-up implementation of the CMS ZpT 13 TeV data set. Comments in #2360 relevant to this data set are taken into account For the time being, standard cuts due to lack of resummation and of EW corrections are implemented.
The values of the chi2 are as follows (with
NNPDF40_nnlo_as_01180as input PDF set)Exp chi2: 1.354
Exp+th chi2: 0.7604
Exp+th+pdf chi2: 0.7573
Here are the data/theory comparison plots. For once, all seems good to me.
