Mathematica notebook to generate scale variation terms#68
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #68 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.30% 88.30%
=======================================
Files 17 17
Lines 633 633
=======================================
Hits 559 559
Misses 74 74
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
|
@andreab1997 in your notebook there is too many repetition for my taste - we should predict e.g. the linear diff between alphas and pdfs; I started a new notebook, maybe you can have a look and tell me what you think? we need this to predict the N3LO stuff |
|
I perfectly agree with @felixhekhorn: in principle, there should only be the two equations we need
that are the two equations regulating the dependence on the nonphysical scales, and the perturbative solutions, with the deriving algorithm, not manually encoded. Essentially, you want to have a place where you put your parameter to We need this because validating the algorithm on lower orders we can be more confident about the solution for higher orders, otherwise we gain little to nothing. |
I a having a look right now :) |
|
sv is now explained in the MHOU paper together with some small MMa snippet |
I am adding a mathematica notebook that we can use to generate scale variation terms for DIS and hadronic case. What it misses at the moment is the N3LO. @alecandido @felixhekhorn