Skip to content

Mathematica notebook to generate scale variation terms#68

Closed
andreab1997 wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
sv_generator
Closed

Mathematica notebook to generate scale variation terms#68
andreab1997 wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
sv_generator

Conversation

@andreab1997
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I am adding a mathematica notebook that we can use to generate scale variation terms for DIS and hadronic case. What it misses at the moment is the N3LO. @alecandido @felixhekhorn

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented Dec 9, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #68 (296db7e) into main (7cc3df6) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #68   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.30%   88.30%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines         633      633           
=======================================
  Hits          559      559           
  Misses         74       74           
Flag Coverage Δ
bench 87.04% <ø> (ø)
unittests 46.28% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@felixhekhorn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@andreab1997 in your notebook there is too many repetition for my taste - we should predict e.g. the linear diff between alphas and pdfs; I started a new notebook, maybe you can have a look and tell me what you think? we need this to predict the N3LO stuff

@felixhekhorn felixhekhorn added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 13, 2022
@alecandido
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I perfectly agree with @felixhekhorn: in principle, there should only be the two equations we need

  • $\alpha_s$ running (beta function)
  • DGLAP equations

that are the two equations regulating the dependence on the nonphysical scales, and the perturbative solutions, with the deriving algorithm, not manually encoded.

Essentially, you want to have a place where you put your parameter to n=2 and obtain NNLO, and n=3 and obtain N3LO. But in principle, you should be able to put also n=50 (even though the calculation might explode, but I don't care about n=50).

We need this because validating the algorithm on lower orders we can be more confident about the solution for higher orders, otherwise we gain little to nothing.

@andreab1997
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@andreab1997 in your notebook there is too many repetition for my taste - we should predict e.g. the linear diff between alphas and pdfs; I started a new notebook, maybe you can have a look and tell me what you think? we need this to predict the N3LO stuff

I a having a look right now :)

@felixhekhorn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sv is now explained in the MHOU paper together with some small MMa snippet

@felixhekhorn felixhekhorn deleted the sv_generator branch March 19, 2024 09:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants