Polarized heavy coeffs#185
Conversation
|
pre-commit.ci autofix |
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
|
@adrianneschauss Thanks for having a start at the implementation! Could you please revert back fe6d952? It is difficult to keep track of what have actually changed with 169 files modified. It is usually ideal to fix only the files that have been modified. The entire refactoring could be done in a separate PR. |
|
We can apply that commit in a separate PR, or even directly on master. Just run |
Someone volunteers for the counterpart of NNPDF/eko#243 here in yadism? 😇 |
I can volunteer 😃 ! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Here are some first batches of comments.
Important: Please move all the tests to the tests folder.
Radonirinaunimi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Some additional comments!
In particular, the three tests should be combine into one single file called for example test_cfh_pol as there is no need them to be in separate files. This would also prevent duplicating the class MockCouplingConstants.
Co-authored-by: Tanjona Rabemananjara <rrabeman@nikhef.nl>
|
This PR is also ready! |
felixhekhorn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like the PR being simple - should be fine ... maybe merge the base branch
giacomomagni
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I left some comments to improve the tests. After that I'm good.
|
Thanks @giacomomagni! I'm merging this now. |
Polarized Heavy Coefficient Functions
about: Using Felix's LeProHQ code to implement the heavy cf's for the structure functions just like the unpolarized case along with tests