This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 7, 2025. It is now read-only.
Ignore classification outputs without corresponding label#682
Merged
lukeyeager merged 1 commit intoNVIDIA:masterfrom Apr 18, 2016
Merged
Ignore classification outputs without corresponding label#682lukeyeager merged 1 commit intoNVIDIA:masterfrom
lukeyeager merged 1 commit intoNVIDIA:masterfrom
Conversation
Since NVIDIA#628 DIGITS does not overwrite the number of outputs in the last fully-connected layer if it is already set to a value. If the user accidentally specifies too large a `num_output` then inference will fail as reported on NVIDIA#678. This change causes classification outputs to be ignored if there is no corresponding label. close NVIDIA#678
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since #628 DIGITS does not overwrite the number of outputs in the last fully-connected layer if it is already set to a value.
If the user accidentally specifies too large a
num_outputthen inference will fail as reported on #678.This change causes classification outputs to be ignored if there is no corresponding label.
close #678