docs: chaining

[cachho]

I personally find this syntax much better, especially when using nested validators, like list or record.

But I guess you could also argue that it's a natural part of python and doesn't have to be explained in the docs.

[Naapperas]

Great catch, I just assumed people would naturally do it and didn't even remember to put it on the README but it is in fact something that by all means should be there. Just added a small correction that needs to be made.

[Naapperas]

Great PR. Could you perhaps rebase this branch against develop so we don't pull in that merge commit? Just a nitpick on my end, the PR itself is ready to be merged into develop.

[cachho]

Great PR. Could you perhaps rebase this branch against develop so we don't pull in that merge commit? Just a nitpick on my end, the PR itself is ready to be merged into develop.

can you check if that's fine for you? Really not an expert on this.

[Naapperas]

Great PR. Could you perhaps rebase this branch against develop so we don't pull in that merge commit? Just a nitpick on my end, the PR itself is ready to be merged into develop.

can you check if that's fine for you? Really not an expert on this.

All set for this PR We lost the requested change. If you wish I can take care of it, you'll still get the credit for the work. Note that, with the merging of your latest PR, the README now has conflicts. Shouldn't take much to resolve.

[Naapperas]

@cachho Any updates on this? I am planning on releasing a new version in a bit. I'll wait a bit and then will myself implement your changes. You'll still get credited.

[Naapperas]

Closed in #23

[cachho]

sorry, yeah I was busy :(