libutil: Fix copyRecursive and use for nix flake clone#14606
Merged
Conversation
The use of sourceToSink is an unnecessary serialization bottleneck. While we are at it, fix the copyRecursive implementation to actually copy the whole directory. It wasn't used for anything prior, but now it has a use and accompanying tests for flake clone.
Ericson2314
approved these changes
Nov 20, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
The use of sourceToSink is an unnecessary serialization bottleneck. While we are at it, fix the copyRecursive implementation to actually copy the whole directory. It wasn't used for anything prior, but now it has a use and accompanying tests for flake clone.
Context
#14602 (comment)
Add 👍 to pull requests you find important.
The Nix maintainer team uses a GitHub project board to schedule and track reviews.