Add no_kv_Svalbard_EUREF89_SVD2024.tif for use in Norwegian ETRS89 transformations

[himsve]

Added no_kv_Svalbard_EUREF89_SVD2024.tif according to OSGeo/PROJ#4562 in PROJ

[himsve]

Building fails due to missing EPSG code 10999, The code is pretty new in EPSG registry.

[jjimenezshaw]

Is there any reason for such a big nodata margin?

I investigated it because the longitude of the top left corner was negative.

$ gdalinfo no_kv_Svalbard_EUREF89_SVD2024.tif 
Driver: GTiff/GeoTIFF
Files: no_kv_Svalbard_EUREF89_SVD2024.tif
Size is 455, 482
Coordinate System is:
GEOGCRS["ETRS89",
...
    ID["EPSG",4937]]
Data axis to CRS axis mapping: 2,1,3
Origin = (-0.044150000000000,83.015200000000007)
Pixel Size = (0.088300000000000,-0.020800000000000)
Metadata:
  area_of_use=Svalbard
  AREA_OR_POINT=Point
  grid_name=no_kv_Svalbard_EUREF89_SVD2024
  target_crs_epsg_code=10999
  TIFFTAG_ARTIST=himsve@kartverket.no
  TIFFTAG_COPYRIGHT=Kartverket (Norwegian Mapping Authority). Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
  TIFFTAG_DATETIME=2025:09:02 10:27:19
  TIFFTAG_DOCUMENTNAME=no_kv_Svalbard_EUREF89_SVD2024.tif
  TIFFTAG_IMAGEDESCRIPTION=ETRS89 height (EPSG:4937) to SVD2024 height (EPSG:10999). Converted from Href_Svalbard_EUREF89_EGG2015_2024.bin
  TIFFTAG_SOFTWARE=geokassa, version 1.6.0.0
  TYPE=VERTICAL_OFFSET_GEOGRAPHIC_TO_VERTICAL
Image Structure Metadata:
  COMPRESSION=DEFLATE
  INTERLEAVE=BAND
  PREDICTOR=3
Corner Coordinates:
Upper Left  (  -0.0441500,  83.0152000) (  0d 2'38.94"W, 83d 0'54.72"N)
Lower Left  (  -0.0441500,  72.9896000) (  0d 2'38.94"W, 72d59'22.56"N)
Upper Right (  40.1323500,  83.0152000) ( 40d 7'56.46"E, 83d 0'54.72"N)
Lower Right (  40.1323500,  72.9896000) ( 40d 7'56.46"E, 72d59'22.56"N)
Center      (  20.0441000,  78.0024000) ( 20d 2'38.76"E, 78d 0' 8.64"N)
Band 1 Block=64x64 Type=Float32, ColorInterp=Gray
  Description = geoid_undulation
  NoData Value=-32768
  Unit Type: metre

[rouault]

I've pushed a commit fixing the index (and ran locally the check_grid_gtiff.py script with the latest PROJ db, confirming it passes OK), and added version_added=1.23 in the .csv file

[rouault]

I'll merge as it for now. Given compression the margin shouldn't had that much to the file size