You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 6, 2023. It is now read-only.
There is a slight difference between python & and python and :
Given A and B is true and is not boolean,
A and B => B
B and A => A
A & B == B & A
Currently, python-client outputs logical and for & operator (which needs to be addressed in that repo).
and is simply ignored.
I have made an implementation of bitwise_and, or and xor processes. I assume that if we always use bitwise operators, we should stay out of trouble famous last words....). I will post a PR later.
Working with packed bitmasks requires bitwise operators is not possible today.
EXAMPLE:
and so on.....
There is a slight difference between python & and python and :
Given A and B is true and is not boolean,
Currently, python-client outputs logical and for & operator (which needs to be addressed in that repo).
and is simply ignored.
I have made an implementation of bitwise_and, or and xor processes. I assume that if we always use bitwise operators, we should stay out of trouble famous last words....). I will post a PR later.