Skip to content

[BUG][Ada] Incorrect client Ada code generated #7594

@stcarrez

Description

@stcarrez

Bug Report Checklist

  • Have you provided a full/minimal spec to reproduce the issue?
  • Have you validated the input using an OpenAPI validator (example)?
  • Have you tested with the latest master to confirm the issue still exists?
  • Have you searched for related issues/PRs?
  • What's the actual output vs expected output?
  • [Optional] Sponsorship to speed up the bug fix or feature request (example)
Description

The Ada client generator generates incorrect code:

  • when a FreeFormObject is used,
  • when several path parameters are used
openapi-generator version

5.0.0-SNAPSHOT.

OpenAPI declaration file content or url

A partial example of URL with two path parameters:

paths:
  '/converter/{format}/{target}':
    post:
      tags:
        - converter
      summary: Convert a text from one format to another
      description: ''
      operationId: convert
      parameters:
        - name: format
          in: path
          description: The source Wiki format
          required: true
          schema:
            type: string
            enum:
              - html
              - markdown
              - dotclear
              - creole
              - mediawiki
        - name: target
          in: path
          description: The target Wiki format
          required: true
          schema:
            type: string
Generation Details
  • The code generator generates the same index number for both path parameters (we can access only the first path parameter!!!)
  • The FreeFormObject generates code that does not compile.
Steps to reproduce

I'm using the following command:

openapi-generator generate --generator-name ada -i file.yaml --additional-properties projectName=todos --model-package Todos -o .
Related issues/PRs
Suggest a fix

I'll submit a pull to fix the above :-)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions