Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
It should be noted that the |
andrew-platt
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2024
Collaborator
|
At first glance, there appears to be some inconsistencies in this section of code. I would excpect |
Contributor
Author
|
I am not sure why the test is failing... |
Collaborator
7de30e3 to
40f5000
Compare
40f5000 to
07e4690
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
My simulation ran to completion so I guess this fixes all the remaining issues with this pathway (at least for this configuration). Thanks for you help. This can be merged whenever you want from my standpoint. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

Feature or improvement description
This PR does a couple of fixes for the ExtInflw path:
nc_def_varsize should take the value of the size of the dim array. The size ofptRefDataDimsis 1 so thenc_def_varshould take a 1. Feels like all of thesenc_def_varshould really be using*Dims.size()But that would lead to a larger diff.extinfwarraybrFSIData) in the ExtInflw pathDiagnosis
The second was:
The third was:
Related issue, if one exists
Impacted areas of the software
openfast-cpp