GuyanLoadCorrection in SubDyn#135
Closed
RBergua wants to merge 1 commit intoOpenFAST:devfrom
RBergua:dev
Closed
Conversation
Collaborator
|
The |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The GuyanLoadCorrection in SubDyn should be always defined as True for fixed-bottom and floating wind turbines.
In the r-test repo, all the models that include SubDyn are fixed-bottom. For these numerical models, the GuyanLoadCorrection will account for the lever arm distance at the interface joint providing more accurate results.
I guess, the automatic testing check may fail because the results are now different. But the results with GuyanLoadCorrection = True are more accurate.
As far as I know, this GuyanLoadCorrection flag may be removed in the future and left as True internally.