Skip to content

Conversation

@IAlibay
Copy link
Member

@IAlibay IAlibay commented Jan 20, 2025

Depends on: choderalab/openmmtools#767

Also see: OpenFreeEnergy/openfe_analysis#44

TODO:

  • Check this works in real life w/ the openfe_analysis patch
  • Check that the settings keywords make sense / match other protocols
  • Check that the frequency defaults are reasonable / yield sufficiently small trajectories
  • Work out the difference in file size compared to current main
  • Better document the frequency writing?
  • Add pydantic validators (at least positive value checks?)
  • Add tests to check that values works (asserting on the reporter's variables) / the right error gets brought up?
  • Add news entry

Developers certificate of origin

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.29630% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.87%. Comparing base (bd95f22) to head (233e90f).
Report is 113 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
openfe/protocols/openmm_utils/omm_settings.py 80.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
openfe/tests/protocols/test_openmm_rfe_slow.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1083      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.49%   91.87%   -1.62%     
==========================================
  Files         142      142              
  Lines       10527    10608      +81     
==========================================
- Hits         9842     9746      -96     
- Misses        685      862     +177     
Flag Coverage Δ
fast-tests 91.87% <96.29%> (?)
slow-tests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann self-requested a review January 22, 2025 09:48
@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann self-assigned this Jan 22, 2025
@IAlibay IAlibay changed the title [WIP] Add support for variable position/velocity trajectory writing Add support for variable position/velocity trajectory writing Jan 28, 2025
@IAlibay IAlibay marked this pull request as ready for review January 28, 2025 14:02
@IAlibay
Copy link
Member Author

IAlibay commented Jan 28, 2025

Check that the frequency defaults are reasonable / yield sufficiently small trajectories

@hannahbaumann the defaults would now yield 50 frames per replica, down from 5000 frames per replica, which should be a large enough reduction in size, what do you think?

@hannahbaumann
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, that sounds like a good size!

@IAlibay
Copy link
Member Author

IAlibay commented Jan 28, 2025

I think everything that needs addressing has been addressed, only thing that's blocking is a release of openmmtools and openfe-analysis, but I'll leave it to you to approve @hannahbaumann !

Copy link
Contributor

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @IAlibay , lgtm! We'll just need to change the pin after the openmmtools release.

@IAlibay
Copy link
Member Author

IAlibay commented Jan 29, 2025

I'm getting the sense the openmmtools release won't be for a few weeks, so we might have to wait until the next OpenFE release to have this merged.

@atravitz atravitz added this to the v1.3.0 milestone Jan 31, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2025

No API break detected ✅

@IAlibay
Copy link
Member Author

IAlibay commented Feb 4, 2025

Checked it out locally, should be good to go.

@IAlibay IAlibay merged commit eef438f into main Feb 4, 2025
12 checks passed
@IAlibay IAlibay deleted the multistate-variablewriting branch February 4, 2025 02:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants