Skip to content

Conversation

@atravitz
Copy link
Contributor

@atravitz atravitz commented Feb 17, 2025

I was getting nervous that we pinned to sphinx<7, and it seems fine to bump us to sphinx 7.2.

@atravitz atravitz requested a review from mikemhenry February 17, 2025 21:47
@atravitz atravitz force-pushed the clean_up_docs_build branch from 8ffec22 to 80ed264 Compare February 17, 2025 21:55
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.89%. Comparing base (829ce37) to head (ea44df1).
Report is 84 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1142      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.53%   91.89%   -1.64%     
==========================================
  Files         142      142              
  Lines       10635    10635              
==========================================
- Hits         9947     9773     -174     
- Misses        688      862     +174     
Flag Coverage Δ
fast-tests 91.89% <ø> (?)
slow-tests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@github-actions
Copy link

No API break detected ✅

@mikemhenry mikemhenry merged commit c32f072 into main Feb 19, 2025
13 checks passed
@mikemhenry mikemhenry deleted the clean_up_docs_build branch February 19, 2025 17:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants