Skip to content

Conversation

@IAlibay
Copy link
Member

@IAlibay IAlibay commented Mar 3, 2025

Exact number here is unclear (and will depend case-by-case), but it at least gets rid of the worst cases.

Checklist

  • Added a news entry

Developers certificate of origin

@atravitz atravitz changed the title Temporary solution for #1173 [WIP] Temporary solution for #1173 Mar 6, 2025
@IAlibay IAlibay changed the title [WIP] Temporary solution for #1173 Temporary solution for #1173 Mar 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @IAlibay , lgtm!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.49%. Comparing base (9732960) to head (61afac5).
Report is 98 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1174      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.14%   92.49%   -1.65%     
==========================================
  Files         141      141              
  Lines       10567    10570       +3     
==========================================
- Hits         9948     9777     -171     
- Misses        619      793     +174     
Flag Coverage Δ
fast-tests 92.49% <100.00%> (?)
slow-tests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO: need to update docs to state that forward reverse is not bootstrap errors.

@github-actions
Copy link

No API break detected ✅

Copy link
Collaborator

@jthorton jthorton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice this should do for now, docs look good as well!

@hannahbaumann
Copy link
Contributor

This looks good to me too, also with the docs!

@IAlibay IAlibay merged commit 384d9cc into main Mar 10, 2025
13 checks passed
@IAlibay IAlibay deleted the chunk_limit branch March 10, 2025 13:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants