Skip to content

Conversation

@mikemhenry
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist

  • Added a news entry

Developers certificate of origin

@mikemhenry mikemhenry marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2025 21:15
@mikemhenry mikemhenry requested a review from atravitz October 23, 2025 21:15
- name: Run example notebooks
run: |
cd example-notebooks
python -m pytest -v setup/ showcase/ cookbook/ openmm_rbfe/ networks/ --nbval-lax --nbval-cell-timeout=3000 -n auto --dist loadscope
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if we add / reorganize the directory this test will pass in a sneaky way - do we need to be so specific here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is how we test it upstream, it is a good question but without specifying a subset of notebooks, they all get tested. Which we might want to do. Looking at the PR where I set this up, I don't see anything like "don't test this notebook" so maybe here (and upstream) we should change it to test everything?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hm, my understanding is that we inherently do want to test anything that is in the example notebooks repo. otherwise it shouldn't be there

Copy link
Contributor

@atravitz atravitz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just One More Thing

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 23, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.89%. Comparing base (aa83a61) to head (bdb7815).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1613      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.34%   92.89%   -2.45%     
==========================================
  Files         183      183              
  Lines       15779    15779              
==========================================
- Hits        15044    14658     -386     
- Misses        735     1121     +386     
Flag Coverage Δ
fast-tests 92.89% <ø> (?)
slow-tests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@atravitz atravitz mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2025
2 tasks
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 9, 2025

No API break detected ✅

@mikemhenry
Copy link
Contributor Author

IDK how long this takes to run, but this should be added to the review checklist since we want to make sure no PR breaks out example notebooks

Copy link
Contributor

@atravitz atravitz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good! agree that it can be in the checklist, but as a discretionary manual (not required or auto-CI) check.

@atravitz atravitz merged commit 12e1f9d into main Nov 10, 2025
13 checks passed
@atravitz atravitz deleted the feat/test-example-notebooks branch November 10, 2025 01:16
@atravitz atravitz mentioned this pull request Dec 4, 2025
7 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants