clear up language a bit for dg report help text #549
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #549 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.38% 91.38%
=======================================
Files 117 117
Lines 7358 7358
=======================================
Hits 6724 6724
Misses 634 634
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
openfecli/commands/gather.py
Outdated
| likelihood estimate of its absolute free, and the uncertainty in | ||
| that. | ||
| likelihood estimate of its absolute free, and the associated | ||
| uncertainty from DDG replica averages and standard deviations. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"derived from the network of" or something like that? Totally not past Balmer's peak
openfecli/commands/gather.py
Outdated
| * 'dg' (default) reports the ligand and the results are the maximum | ||
| likelihood estimate of its absolute free, and the uncertainty in | ||
| that. | ||
| * 'dg' (default) reports the ligand and the results as the maximum |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry @mikemhenry I overwrote this a bit, totally agreed it needed a change, just thought it might need a bit of an expansion on what you wrote.
@hannahbaumann does this seem sensible to you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, I think this generally sounds good, I was just a little bit confused about the "likelihood estimate of its absolute free" part and also the comma before ,and makes it look a little bit like the "from DDG replica averages and standard deviations" only belongs to the "uncertainty" part.
Maybe something like:
"* 'dg' (default) reports the ligand and its absolute free energy and the associated uncertainty as the maximum likelihood estimate obtained from DDG replica averages and standard deviations." Or maybe that's even more confusing, I'm not sure =)
|
@hannahbaumann - I'm leaving this one in your hands to review / merge. |
Developers certificate of origin