Skip to content

Conversation

@atravitz
Copy link
Contributor

@atravitz atravitz commented Oct 31, 2024

Edits just to the top level and Setup section. Further edits for other sections (and to update graphics) will follow in later PRs.

Developers certificate of origin

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.84%. Comparing base (4c06370) to head (6e44bfb).
Report is 203 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #995      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.59%   92.84%   -1.76%     
==========================================
  Files         134      134              
  Lines        9940     9940              
==========================================
- Hits         9403     9229     -174     
- Misses        537      711     +174     
Flag Coverage Δ
fast-tests 92.84% <ø> (?)
slow-tests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@atravitz atravitz marked this pull request as ready for review November 1, 2024 21:38
@atravitz atravitz requested a review from mikemhenry November 1, 2024 21:39
Copy link
Member

@IAlibay IAlibay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm going to put a block here because it looks like some of the things here will need some discussion / will have differing views.

atravitz and others added 2 commits November 5, 2024 14:33
Co-authored-by: Irfan Alibay <IAlibay@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Irfan Alibay <IAlibay@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@ijpulidos ijpulidos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Much clearer and concise, great work! I just added some comments.

Copy link
Contributor

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank for you all your work on this @atravitz , this looks great overall! Just left a few suggestions!

atravitz and others added 10 commits November 12, 2024 11:07
Co-authored-by: Iván Pulido <2949729+ijpulidos@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Hannah Baumann <43765638+hannahbaumann@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Irfan Alibay <IAlibay@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Iván Pulido <2949729+ijpulidos@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor Author

@atravitz atravitz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@IAlibay A couple items I addressed but you should take one more look at. I think we need to revisit the ligand network section as a whole. Maybe a follow-up PR?

The :func:`default_lomap_score` function combines several criteria
(such as the number of heavy atoms, if certain chemical changes are present,
and if ring sizes are being mutated), into a single value.
It is possible to combine scoring functions in this way because each scoring function returns a normalized value.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let me know if this is better.

@mikemhenry
Copy link
Contributor

+1 to removing see also from the TOC but keeping that section on the page
image

@mikemhenry
Copy link
Contributor

same with references
image

@mikemhenry
Copy link
Contributor

Also while we are at it, I think we should have a call to action on this page:
https://openfe--995.org.readthedocs.build/en/995/guide/introduction.html

In between the Introduction and Workflow overview section as a .. note:: that is something like "If you have used openfe, please use this citation xxx." I think some sentence about also sponsoring the project would be good as well.

Also also, feel free to just convert this comment into an issue if you think it warrants further discussion and/or is outside the scope of the PR.

atravitz and others added 2 commits November 14, 2024 12:53
Co-authored-by: Mike Henry <11765982+mikemhenry@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, lgtm!

@atravitz atravitz merged commit 9b0b4b2 into main Nov 15, 2024
9 checks passed
@atravitz atravitz deleted the docs_user_guide_edits branch November 15, 2024 14:57
@atravitz atravitz mentioned this pull request Nov 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants