Decide what part of UTILs documentation should be added to openms.readthedocs.io (if)

[tapaswenipathak]

#65 (comment).

Ref:

• https://abibuilder.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/archive/openms/Documentation/nightly/html/UTILS_documentation.html
• 

[jpfeuffer]

I think for now UTILS should be exactly handled like TOPP. Just with another overall description. Currently we use them more as a collection of helper tools or untested tools.

[tapaswenipathak]

On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 1:42 PM Julianus Pfeuffer ***@***.***> wrote: I think for now UTILS should be exactly handled like TOPP. Just with another overall description. Currently we use them more as a collection of helper tools or untested tools.

1. there is no UTILS tut. 2. there are no introductory UTILS docs that can be added to openms.readthedocs.io. 3. other than one-line description of UTILS, redirecting to UTILS API reference, there is nothing substantial in openms.readthedocs.io about UTILS.

…

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[jpfeuffer]

That's why we should mention them together with TOPP so that people treat them almost equally.
I.e. whenever one links to TOPP tools, also link to UTIL tools.