Skip to content

Conversation

@poshul
Copy link
Contributor

@poshul poshul commented Feb 2, 2026

Add Kyowon's and Peter's project proposals.

Brief description of what is fixed or changed

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Added two new GSoC 2026 project themes (dependency management; visualization & results) with proposals, mentors, skills, and estimated effort.
    • Expanded an existing project theme with performance-focused goals and systematic evaluation details.
    • Minor formatting cleanup in mentor/skills lines.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed duplicate/duplicated sections introduced in the GSoC document.

Added new themes and project proposals for GSoC 2026, including dependency management and visualization projects.
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 2, 2026

Deploy Preview for openms ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 736c33f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/openms/deploys/69809861a8946500086ae439
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-243--openms.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 2, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds GSoC 2026 news content: expands Theme A (OpenSwathWorkflow) with performance goals and adds two new project themes (Theme B: Dependency management; Theme C: Visualization and results). New sections were inserted and appear duplicated in the file.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
GSoC 2026 Documentation
content/en/news/GSoC2026.md
Expanded Theme A with performance-focused objectives; added two new Theme sections (B and C) including project proposals, mentors, skills, and effort estimates. Insertions cause duplicated/repeated content blocks and minor formatting adjustments.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 I hopped through lines of summer plans,
Two new themes tucked in gentle hands,
Performance tuned and visuals bright,
Dependencies kept tidy and light.
A duplicate bloom—snip once, all's right.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive The description includes a brief summary of changes but lacks detailed explanation of what was changed and which specific projects were added. The template section remains mostly unfilled with placeholder comments. Expand the description to clearly identify which projects (Kyowon's and Peter's) correspond to Theme B and C, and provide more context about the changes made.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: adding new project themes (Theme B and C) to the GSoC2026.md file.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch poshul-patch-6

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@timosachsenberg
Copy link
Contributor

check if we can that free in specifying the number of hours.

@poshul
Copy link
Contributor Author

poshul commented Feb 2, 2026

check if we can that free in specifying the number of hours.

There are "small" "medium" and "large" projects, my understanding is that the number of hours is an estimate based on that. See: https://google.github.io/gsocguides/mentor/setting-expectations. That said @pjones can you specify whether this should be a "medium" or "large" project, and I can update the hours to match Google's guidance?

Updated formatting for proposed mentors and skills sections in GSoC2026.md for consistency.
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
content/en/news/GSoC2026.md (1)

95-98: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Fix duplicate task numbering in the list.

The list has two items labeled “1.” which renders confusingly in Markdown. Renumber to a consistent sequence (1–5).

✅ Suggested edit
-1. Develop a comprehensive understanding for the OpenSwathWorkflow algorithm
-1. Develop a benchmarking dataset for profiling. 
+1. Develop a comprehensive understanding for the OpenSwathWorkflow algorithm
+2. Develop a benchmarking dataset for profiling.
-2. Profile OpenSwathWorkflow to identify computational bottlenecks.
-3. Identify algorithmic bottlenecks and propose changes. 
-4. Experiment with different algorithms using inspiration from other open source DIA projects.  
-5. Validate that the optimized implementation provides comparable results to the original implementation and other DIA software tools.
+3. Profile OpenSwathWorkflow to identify computational bottlenecks.
+4. Identify algorithmic bottlenecks and propose changes.
+5. Experiment with different algorithms using inspiration from other open source DIA projects.
+6. Validate that the optimized implementation provides comparable results to the original implementation and other DIA software tools.
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@content/en/news/GSoC2026.md`:
- Around line 113-123: Replace "large scale" with "large-scale" and simplify
wording like "in order to" to "to" for readability; specifically update the
opening sentence ("Like many large-scale software projects, OpenMS has numerous
development dependencies."), shorten phrases such as "in order to quickly and
easily install" to "to quickly and easily install" (or better: "to quickly
install"), and tidy the final sentence so it reads smoothly and completes the
thought (e.g., "A successful outcome will be a simplified developer experience
where only a small number of tools are required.").
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
content/en/news/GSoC2026.md (1)

85-87: Consider consistent formatting for “Difficulty”.

Other sections use bold labels; here “Difficulty” lacks bolding and a colon format. Aligning formatting improves scanability in the published page.

Comment on lines +113 to +123
Like many large scale software projects, OpenMS has numerous
development dependencies. Unfortunately, there is no straightforward
way to quickly and easily install all of these dependencies. Some can
be installed using various package managers such as `apt-get`, `brew`,
or `choco`, while others need to be installed with a Python package
manager such as `conda`. And finally, some dependencies need to be
compiled from source code manually.

The goal of this project is to unify dependency management using the
vcpkg package manager. A successful outcome will be a simplified
developer experience where only a small number of tools are required
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Tighten grammar and phrasing for clarity.

Minor style nits: “large scale” should be hyphenated, and “in order to” can be shortened for readability.

✅ Suggested edit
-Like many large scale software projects, OpenMS has numerous
+Like many large-scale software projects, OpenMS has numerous
 ...
-developer experience where only a small number of tools are required
-in order to set up a full OpenMS development environment.
+developer experience where only a few tools are required
+to set up a full OpenMS development environment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~113-~113: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ... Difficulty: Medium Like many large scale software projects, OpenMS has nume...

(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)


[style] ~123-~123: Specify a number, remove phrase, use “a few”, or use “some”
Context: ...plified developer experience where only a small number of tools are required in order to set up a...

(SMALL_NUMBER_OF)


[style] ~123-~123: Consider a more concise word here.
Context: ...ly a small number of tools are required in order to set up a full OpenMS development enviro...

(IN_ORDER_TO_PREMIUM)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@content/en/news/GSoC2026.md` around lines 113 - 123, Replace "large scale"
with "large-scale" and simplify wording like "in order to" to "to" for
readability; specifically update the opening sentence ("Like many large-scale
software projects, OpenMS has numerous development dependencies."), shorten
phrases such as "in order to quickly and easily install" to "to quickly and
easily install" (or better: "to quickly install"), and tidy the final sentence
so it reads smoothly and completes the thought (e.g., "A successful outcome will
be a simplified developer experience where only a small number of tools are
required.").

@pjones
Copy link

pjones commented Feb 2, 2026

check if we can that free in specifying the number of hours.

There are "small" "medium" and "large" projects, my understanding is that the number of hours is an estimate based on that. See: https://google.github.io/gsocguides/mentor/setting-expectations. That said @pjones can you specify whether this should be a "medium" or "large" project, and I can update the hours to match Google's guidance?

I would say the vcpkg project is a medium-sized project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants