Skip to content

Remove explicit llvmlite dep to fix Conda resolution on osx-64#9

Open
tylerjthomas9 wants to merge 5 commits intoOutlierDetectionJL:masterfrom
tylerjthomas9:tyler/osx-64-conda-patch
Open

Remove explicit llvmlite dep to fix Conda resolution on osx-64#9
tylerjthomas9 wants to merge 5 commits intoOutlierDetectionJL:masterfrom
tylerjthomas9:tyler/osx-64-conda-patch

Conversation

@tylerjthomas9
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tylerjthomas9 tylerjthomas9 commented Mar 27, 2026

Ref JuliaAI/MLJModelRegistryTools.jl#10

Remove explicit llvmlite dep and numba channel from CondaPkg.toml. Pinning llvmlite to the numba channel causes resolution failures on osx-64 when Python is pinned to 3.13 (numba channel's llvmlite builds are lagging behind conda-forge).

@ablaom Let me know if this fixes it for you. I tested the resolution with pixi targeting osx-64 from an ARM machine and verified the old config fails with your error and the new config works.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Mar 27, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.29%. Comparing base (b845d19) to head (e7130a8).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master       #9       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   70.37%   97.29%   +26.92%     
===========================================
  Files           2        2               
  Lines          27       37       +10     
===========================================
+ Hits           19       36       +17     
+ Misses          8        1        -7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ablaom
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ablaom commented Mar 30, 2026

@tylerjthomas9 Yes, this fixes my problem. Fantastic.

@davnn Can you please review?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants