Skip to content

Conversation

@Deleter-D
Copy link
Collaborator

@Deleter-D Deleter-D commented Jan 8, 2026

Motivation

💡 If this PR is a Cherry Pick, the PR title needs to follow the format by adding the [Cherry-Pick] label at the very beginning and appending the original PR ID at the end. For example, [Cherry-Pick][CI] Add check trigger and logic(#5191)

💡 如若此PR是Cherry Pick,PR标题需遵循格式,在最开始加上[Cherry-Pick]标签,以及最后面加上原PR ID,例如[Cherry-Pick][CI] Add check trigger and logic(#5191)

Modifications

Based on PR #5518, the number of accepted tokens per head is newly added to the response, with an example return shown below.

{
    "id": "xxx",
    "model": "xxx",
    "choices": [
        {
            ...
            "speculate_metrics": {
                "accepted_tokens": 128,
                "rejected_tokens": 112,
                "accept_ratio": 0.53125,
                "average_accept_length": 2.1333333333333333,
                "accepted_tokens_per_head": [
                   60,
                   36,
                   23,
                   9
                ]
                "accept_ratio_per_head": [
                    0.6,
                    0.6388888888888888,
                    0.391304347826087
                ]
            }
        }
    ],
    ...
}

The acceptance rate for each head is calculated as follows.

for i in range (1, len(accepted_tokens_per_head)):
    accept_ratio_per_head[i - 1] = accepted_tokens_per_head[i] / accepted_tokens_per_head[i - 1]

accepted_tokens_per_head[0] is equivalent to the number of decoding steps.

Usage or Command

Accuracy Tests

Checklist

  • Add at least a tag in the PR title.
    • Tag list: [[FDConfig],[APIServer],[Engine], [Scheduler], [PD Disaggregation], [Executor], [Graph Optimization], [Speculative Decoding], [RL], [Models], [Quantization], [Loader], [OP], [KVCache], [DataProcessor], [BugFix], [Docs], [CI], [Optimization], [Feature], [Benchmark], [Others], [XPU], [HPU], [GCU], [DCU], [Iluvatar], [Metax]]
    • You can add new tags based on the PR content, but the semantics must be clear.
  • Format your code, run pre-commit before commit.
  • Add unit tests. Please write the reason in this PR if no unit tests.
  • Provide accuracy results.
  • If the current PR is submitting to the release branch, make sure the PR has been submitted to the develop branch, then cherry-pick it to the release branch with the [Cherry-Pick] PR tag.

@paddle-bot
Copy link

paddle-bot bot commented Jan 8, 2026

Thanks for your contribution!

@Deleter-D Deleter-D changed the title [Others] Adjust log level for request-level speculative logging [Speculative Decoding] Return accepted tokens per head in response Jan 8, 2026
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 8, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (develop@d8c6ba6). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             develop    #5947   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage           ?   67.05%           
==========================================
  Files              ?      348           
  Lines              ?    44654           
  Branches           ?     6867           
==========================================
  Hits               ?    29943           
  Misses             ?    12502           
  Partials           ?     2209           
Flag Coverage Δ
GPU 67.05% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Deleter-D added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2026
…n response (#5947) (#5952)

* adjust log level
* add accepted tokens per head
@yuanlehome yuanlehome merged commit 3ca99ab into PaddlePaddle:develop Jan 9, 2026
18 of 21 checks passed
@Deleter-D Deleter-D deleted the dev_query_acc_log branch January 12, 2026 03:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants