-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
Move MultiInstance tests to RavenDB 5 #3720
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
ramonsmits
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok with this although it feels a bit complex
...eControl.MultiInstance.AcceptanceTests/SagaAudit/When_sending_saga_audit_to_main_instance.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| using System.Threading.Tasks; | ||
| using NServiceBus.CustomChecks; | ||
|
|
||
| class SagaAuditDestinationCustomCheck : CustomCheck |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we want to add an obsolete tag to remove this in SC 6.0?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't have ObsoleteEx in ServiceControl. Do you just mean a regular Obsolete? Do you think that would even get found / looked for?
I can definitely raise an issue in the repo and put it on the 6.0.0 milestone.
| return passResult; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| var message = $"In the last 24 hours, the following endpoints have reported saga audit data to the ServiceControl Primary instance. Instead, saga audit data should be sent to the Audit Queue Name configured in the ServiceControl Audit Instance. Affected endpoints: " |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice!
ramonsmits
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, added a few code comment suggestions regarding resolving the audit queue
Co-authored-by: Ramon Smits <ramon.smits@gmail.com>
No description provided.