Skip to content

Conversation

@DavidBoike
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@ramonsmits ramonsmits left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok with this although it feels a bit complex

@DavidBoike DavidBoike requested a review from ramonsmits October 3, 2023 20:51
@DavidBoike DavidBoike requested a review from tmasternak October 3, 2023 20:57
@DavidBoike DavidBoike self-assigned this Oct 3, 2023
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using NServiceBus.CustomChecks;

class SagaAuditDestinationCustomCheck : CustomCheck
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to add an obsolete tag to remove this in SC 6.0?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't have ObsoleteEx in ServiceControl. Do you just mean a regular Obsolete? Do you think that would even get found / looked for?

I can definitely raise an issue in the repo and put it on the 6.0.0 milestone.

return passResult;
}

var message = $"In the last 24 hours, the following endpoints have reported saga audit data to the ServiceControl Primary instance. Instead, saga audit data should be sent to the Audit Queue Name configured in the ServiceControl Audit Instance. Affected endpoints: "
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

Copy link
Member

@ramonsmits ramonsmits left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, added a few code comment suggestions regarding resolving the audit queue

DavidBoike and others added 2 commits October 4, 2023 08:01
Co-authored-by: Ramon Smits <ramon.smits@gmail.com>
@DavidBoike DavidBoike merged commit b917c48 into master Oct 4, 2023
@DavidBoike DavidBoike deleted the multi-instance-5 branch October 4, 2023 13:52
@DavidBoike DavidBoike added this to the 5.0.0 milestone Nov 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants