-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Open
Description
Thank you for your great work. I have some questions about the communication computation and the effect of code size.
- As the paper said, the bandwidth computation involves n_L which is the size of the codebook(I guess). But on the spatial level, the data is H×W× |M|, is n_L needed to compute the transfer data? or does the bandwidth involve the size of the codebook?
the bandwidth given the selection matrix M is calculated as log2(H × W × |M| × log2(nL) × nR/8). Here, log2(nL) signifies the data amount required to represent each code index integer, decided by the codebook size.
If the bandwidth just computes the transmitted code indices, I think log2( H × W × | M | × nR / 8 ) is fair.
- According to the paper it seems to work best with a codebook size of 64, according to my reproduction the results are not as good as in the paper, does this involve fine-tuning or other training techniques?
Besides, how does the w/o codebook achieve the transfer? Is it by passing all the data?

Thank you for your work again.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels