Add option to split by class/module + cleanup#4
Add option to split by class/module + cleanup#4Jeff-Meadows wants to merge 4 commits intoPolicyStat:masterfrom
Conversation
Add tests for this and a test to make sure all tests are picked up. Fix a few style issues. Remove broken test envs - hash_ring isn't py3 compatible, so neither is this, and conf.py is missing so docs don't work either. Add Travis CI integration.
…plit__ attribute is found.
|
Hi Jeff, Thanks for this! Lots of good cleanup here and I like the idea of providing control of where things can be split. I'll plan on giving this a good look on Tuesday. My initial impressions:
|
|
Hi Wes, Thanks for taking a look. You're right that this feature would need documentation. As for the dunder, it was a misreading of the way the built in multiprocess nose plugin did things. I wanted to keep it consistent. I'll submit another commit where it's a single leading and trailing underscore. 😄 |
…me to a single underscore.
|
Hi Jeff, Sorry for being so slow to review this. I wanted to get to it today. Tomorrow is another day :) -Wes |
distributed_nose/plugin.py
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So it looks like what we're actually returning here is returning either the class or the module if we can't split it, right?
I think we could simplify this code and reduce the duplication inside validateName by making this method instead always return a string representing the lowest level at which this method/class/module can be split. So for things that can be split, we'd return '%s.%s' % (module, call). For a module that can't be split, we'd return '%s' % module. For a class that can't be split, '%s' % klass
Maybe this could be called getLowestSplitLevelHash? It should also probably include a quick docstring to this effect.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great suggestion and I even uncovered some bugs/weird behaviors while refactoring.
This code will split at the class level even if the module specifies no splitting, but that's fixed in the next commit.
|
Hi Jeff, Thanks again for this pull request. Controlling the split behavior is super useful. Would you mind adding yourself to AUTHORS and writing up a quick CHANGELOG entry for 0.2.0 announcing your awesome new feature? -Wes |
Update CHANGELOG and version number. Refactor how the splitting works and add a bit more documentation.
|
/poke =D |
|
Hey Wes, I'd really love to see this merged. Anything you need from me to make it happen? |
|
@Jeff-Meadows Wes is actually on vacation until about the end of the month, so it will be a few weeks at least until he can look at this again. |
3 participants
No description provided.